India and USA to enter into a bilateral aviation safety agreement

The Governments of India and the United States are in the process of entering into bilateral aviation safety agreement. As the aviation vendor base of both Boeing and Airbus increase in India, the eventual goal is for this agreement to lead to an agreement allowing for the mutual acceptance of aeronautical products and parts developed in either country.

A six member team of the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) recently visited the New Delhi head-quarters and completed a technical assessment review of the aircraft certification system of India's Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) in eleven defined areas, which, the DGCA, is reported to have passed with flying colours.

Subsequently, the FAA team carried out review of a shadow certification project where the DGCA carried out actual work as per procedures and standards of the FAA. The project was the development of a 4-seat general aviation life-raft by US aviation vendor Goodrich Corp., at Bangalore (where else, but the hub of aviation manufacturing in India).

After complete evaluation, the DGCA has already awarded an India Technical Standard Order Authorization (ITSOA) to Goodrich.

Consequent to these two actions, the FAA will send a final assessment report to the DGCA and commence the process to exchange documents for signing of an Executive Agreement. This will be the first agreement of its type for the DGCA.

Read more »

EASA proposes Airworthiness Directive on Airbus A330/A340 Thales pitot probes

The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) has released a Proposal for an Airworthiness Directive (PAD) requiring all Airbus A330 and A340 aircraft currently equipped with Thales pitot probes should be equipped with Goodrich pitot probes on position 1 (Captain) and 3 (Standby) instead, while pitot probe 2 (first officer) should be upgraded to the enhanced Thales pitot probe type BA or to the Goodrich pitot probe.

The PAD reasons

Occurrences have been reported on A330/340 family aeroplanes of airspeed indication discrepancies while flying at high altitudes in inclement weather conditions. Investigation results indicate that A330/A340 aeroplanes equipped with Thales Avionics pitot probes appear to have a greater susceptibility to adverse environmental conditions than aeroplanes equipped with Goodrich pitot probes.

A new Thales Pitot probe Part Number (P/N) C16195BA has been designed which improves A320 aeroplane airspeed indication behaviour in heavy rain conditions. This same pitot probe standard has been made available as optional installation on A330/A340 aeroplanes, and although this has shown an improvement over the previous P/N C16195AA standard, it has not yet demonstrated the same level of robustness to withstand high-altitude ice crystals as the Goodrich P/N 0851HL probe. At this time, no other pitot probes are approved for installation on the A330/A340 family of aeroplanes.

Airspeed discrepancies may lead in particular to disconnection of the autopilot and/or auto-thrust functions, and reversion to Flight Control Alternate law, which would cause an increase of pilot workload. Depending on the prevailing aeroplane altitude and weather, this condition, if not corrected, could result in reduced control of the aeroplane.

For the reasons described above, this AD is a precautionary measure and requires the removal from service of all Thales Avionics P/N C16195AA pitot probes, the replacement of Thales Avionics P/N C16195BA pitot probes at positions 1 (Captain) and 3 (Stand by) with Goodrich P/N 0851HL probes and the installation at position 2 (First Officer) of a Thales Avionics pitot probe P/N C16195BA. This AD is considered to be an interim measure and further AD action cannot be excluded.

The upgrade is to be accomplished within 4 months after the Airworthiness Directive (AD) becomes effective. EASA is open for consultation on this proposal until September 7 2009.

Readers will observe the Aero-Instruments 0851HL-AI Pitot Probe , recently approved by the US Federal Aviation Administration for use on all Airbus A320/A330/A340 families of aircraft, is not mentioned in the EASA PAD.

Hat tip to Simon Hradecky at AVHerald for the story.

Read more »

Air France #AF447: The search so far - some great sources of information - IAG and ATI

The search and recovery operations go on for Air France AF-447, as does my search for information. Some information I recommend as well worth reading and listening.

My good friend Addison Schonland at IAG has created and continues to create a nice series of articles and podcasts on AF447.

• A decoding and analysis of the ACARS messages
• A podcast of an interview with an avionics engineer familiar with the Honeywell ACARS system fitted on board the Air France Airbus A330-203 F-GZCP.
• A podcast of an interview with experienced commercial pilot, Doug Willey who explains the pre-flight procedures as well as how a flight tracks its route.
  
• A podcast of an interview with Dr. John Craven, a veteran on many underwater search operations, on the challenges to locate the "black boxes" flight data and cockpit voice recoders from the ill-fated flight from Rio to Paris.

This article on CNN written by Kieran Daly, Editor of Air Transport Intelligence is also a "must read".

For those Bangalore Aviation readers of a more technical mind-set - we have been hearing a lot about the possible freezing of the pitot probes (also called pitot speed sensors) on the Airbus A330, and the replacement being offered by Thales. Thales a French company, was the vendor for the pitot probes most likely model C16195BA on the Air France aircraft.

Goodrich is also a vendor of pitot tubes on Airbus aircraft and a competitor to Thales. The product documentation of their new model 0851HL pitot probe which is a replacement for the older model 0851GR pitot probe, is also very conveniently positioned as a replacement for it's "competitor" - read Thales. The document makes some very interesting reading on the icing problem that afflicts the older pitot probes and what changes have been made to address the problem.

I must caution that I am no way implying, nor should we in any way assume, that Thales products are inferior to those of Goodrich.

All said and done we still have to wait for facts and Kieran's words best summarises my feelings "But the fact remains that this is today speculation".

Read more »