Analysis - SpiceJet likely to order Boeing 737 MAX, but not immediately

Earlier this week, the Wall Street Journal quoted a report from the Center for Asia Pacific Aviation (CAPA) as saying that India’s largest publicly-traded low cost carrier (LCC), Chennai-based SpiceJet, was “is in advanced discussions to order 30-40 Boeing 737 MAX aircraft, the Centre for Asia-Pacific Aviation (CAPA) has said.” This report was then seized on by several outlets in India, including one that quoted SpiceJet CEO Neil Mills as saying that SpiceJet may consider ordering Airbus aircraft as well.

First, we feel that SpiceJet is likely to order the Boeing 737 MAX at some point. While Mr. Mills may be paying lip-service to the idea of ordering next generation narrowbodies from Airbus, our own internal projections, as well as those of most independent analysts find that the A320neo and the 737 MAX will end up within two percent of each other in terms of operational costs per seat mile, with the primary variables for decisions likely to be pricing and commonality with the current fleet. SpiceJet currently operates a fleet of 35 Boeing 737NGs (29 -800s and 6 -900s), so that would tilt the scales between three to four percent towards the MAX. As a loyal Boeing customer, SpiceJet would also likely get a discount on the MAX of between 35-45% off of list price. The combination of these two factors would require such a large discount from Airbus to overcome that SpiceJet is unlikely to order A320neos (a sentiment supported by our sources at the LCC).

As for the timing of the order, while SpiceJet is in all likelihood discussing a MAX order with Boeing at the moment, the order is unlikely to be finalized any time soon. Furthermore, we do not feel that it would be prudent for SpiceJet to order any new 737s at this time.

The size of the proposed order (30-40 airframes) is smart. When combined with SpiceJet’s outstanding order for 20 737NGs, it would allow for fleet replacement and a limited amount of growth, while not over-committing SpiceJet to new airplanes. The latter is a common outcome for LCCs around the world that ordered large numbers of narrowbodies during the mid 2000s and are now stuck in a cycle of profitless growth. But making the order now would not be a smart move. To start with, financing right now is a challenge for Indian carriers; SpiceJet itself is supposedly having trouble financing the 3 remaining Q400 deliveries and is likewise hesitant to firm up its 15 purchase options for the 78 seat turboprop because of credit constraints. The current environment for financing aircraft deliveries in India is not favorable – the combination of an ever-weakening Rupee and several sectors of prolonged losses have sent interest rates for aircraft deliveries skyrocketing.

More to the point, there is a stock market analogy to explain why SpiceJet should not order the 737 MAX right now. Many industry analysts have concluded (and we agree with this view) that there is currently an aircraft order bubble for narrowbodies. This means that the prices of these aircraft are artificially inflated thanks to higher than normal demand. The general rule of thumb you hear when playing the stock market is to buy low and sell high - this strategy works - if you had purchased stocks in March 2009 at the trough of the recession, today those stocks would have (on average) doubled in value. The same principle applies to assets. Several LCCs (most notably purchased 737s and A320s in the down period while the industry was in post-9/11 doldrums, then made a cash profit on sale-leaseback as aircraft valuations boomed during the latter part of the decade. On the flip side, carriers that purchased large quantities of narrowbodies during the boom times of the 90s had to deal with heavy losses due to depreciation in that post 9/11 period. Right now, conditions for aircraft purchases are similar to those during the 1990s, SpiceJet would thus do well to wait for pricing to become a bit more rational. The 737 MAX is already sold out till 2019 at the earliest - waiting another six months to one year to place an order will not put SpiceJet too far behind the curve.
Read more »

Analysis - Jet Airways decision to axe Chennai-Brussels and add Bangalore-Munich is viable

It has been almost a month since India’s largest airline Jet Airways announced that it was cancelling its flights between Chennai (India’s third largest city) and its once robust scissors hub in Brussels, and I still am having trouble fully understanding the impetus behind the decision, though I do believe that there is a scenario where the move(s) made by Jet do make sense. The cancellation left Jet Airways with just 4 daily flights in Brussels; Mumbai and Delhi on the Indian side – Newark and Toronto on the North American side.

Separately, Jet Airways appears to be launching a daily Bangalore – Munich terminator as Jet Airways flights 152/153, though the route has not yet been officially announced by Jet Airways and the winter 2012-2013 flight schedules have not been finalized.

The elimination of Chennai-Brussels flies in the face of the strategy we outlined earlier this year for Jet Airways’ North American operations, which called for an expansion of the scissors hub. From a practical perspective, it reduces the value of Jet Airways to Star Alliance (by eliminating a hub-hub route), while also reducing the attractiveness of Jet Airways to the rapidly burgeoning merchant and manufacturing travel base in Chennai by eliminating the direct flights.

Adding Bangalore-Munich makes more sense, especially if the expanded partnership between Jet Airways and Lufthansa comes to fruition. Even with a Lufthansa partnership, 9W 153 is not timed optimally to connect into Lufthansa’s North American bank in mid-afternoon; the 8:35 am arrival would require a 6-7 hour connection for most US destinations. The United, US Airways, and Air Canada flights are timed a little bit closer to the Jet Airways arrival but the business case seems to be primarily built on European connections.

As of right now, Jet appears to have no immediate plans to terminate the Mumbai-Newark and Delhi-Toronto services through Brussels. What this implies is that Jet Airways plans to continue with both a European operation to Munich, and a North American operation through Brussels. This sort of split operation is typically a bad idea, because instead of a strong European operation in one place, you can end up with a weaker operation in each of two places. That being said, there is a scenario under which the switch would make sense.

Since Jet Airways currently under-utilizes its fleet of Airbus A330-200 aircraft, two A330s could be dedicated to Munich flights from Bangalore and Chennai. The purpose of these flights would be to feed into Lufthansa’s Munich hub and secure the two major Indian cities currently outside of Lufthansa’s destination portfolio in Munich. The flights would be timed to depart India in the early morning (between 6 and 8 am), and arrive in Munich around noon. 

The critical piece is securing membership in the Trans-Atlantic joint venture (JV) partnership between Lufthansa, United, Swiss, Austrian Airlines, and Air Canada. The JV offers its members anti-trust immunity (ATI) for all trans-Atlantic flights. In practice, this means that the airlines can act like one business across the Atlantic; sharing the costs and profits of their respective trans-Atlantic network proportionally to their size, jointly marketing and selling trans-Atlantic tickets, and most importantly being allowed to coordinate and discuss strategy. It doesn’t matter to United if a passenger flies Lufthansa’s Frankfurt-Newark leg or United’s; because United will still get a share of the profits.

Without membership in this JV, the Munich flights by Jet will have to be treated as Indian competition for Lufthansa’s lucrative business here (especially in Bangalore). Once under the umbrella of ATI, these flights can instead be treated as strengthening additions to the Star Alliance hub in Munich – giving Jet a shot at financial viability. I am still not fond of Jet’s decision to abandon Chennai-Brussels and add Bangalore-Munich, but I can understand the strategy behind it.
Read more »

Hooray for the courts. Drunk IndiGo passenger gets life term for threatening a hijacking

Early in February 2009, Bangalore Aviation had advocated a strong "zero tolerance" approach to drunk passengers in Indian skies, specifically citing the case of Jitendra Kumar Mohla, a Chartered Accountant, and son of a former Air Commodore of the Indian Air Force, who boarded an IndiGo flight 6E-334 from Goa to New Delhi, in a drunk condition.

Today, we are happy to report that District Judge IS Mehta threw the book at Mohla and sentenced him to life imprisonment. He was convicted under Section 3(1) (D) of the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against Safety of Civil Aviation Act, 1982, which deals with offences on board an aircraft. Mohla, however, was acquitted on the charges framed under the Anti Hijacking Act.

During the flight Mohla misbehaved with a stewardess and threatened the entire crew, saying that he was armed. He said he had two accomplices on the board and they would hijack the plane. He also said that he was official of the Director General of Civil Aviation (DGCA)

According to the police, Mohla had allegedly entered the plane’s cockpit and sparked panic by claiming that he had hijacked the plane. The prosecution has claimed that Mohla had also warned the crew members that he was one of the accused in the infamous 1999 Kandahar hijacking (an Indian Airlines A300 IC 814, from Kathmandu to Delhi was hijacked) and was carrying needles with which he will “infect” others if they resisted him.

This judgement has sent a clear signal for airlines to act against mischief makers on-board their flights by separating intent from actions. The judge said
“Even if it is presumed that he (Mohla) had no such intention, it must be attributed that he knew he was on board an Indigo flight carrying 160 passengers and his terrifying act could endanger the safety of the passengers as well as the aircraft in flight”
One now hopes Indian carriers will take stringent action against perpetrators rather than practising an act of blanket denial. (Today, service of alcohol is prohibited on domestic flights due to past instances of passenger misbehaviour.)
Read more »

Malaysia Airlines to join oneworld alliance on Feburary 1

Malaysia Airlines will become a full member of the oneworld® alliance on Friday February 1, 2013. The national airline of Malaysia received clearance after successfully completing a review of its readiness conducted by its mentor, Qantas, along with the oneworld central team.
Malaysia Airlines' Airbus A380 superjumbo makes a high speed pass over the Farnborough air show 2012.

Malaysia Airlines' entry in to the alliance is being delayed due to the end-of-year holiday season and for "other administrative reasons".

The 2 million members of Malaysia Airlines' Enrich loyalty programme will integrate with oneworld member airlines - airberlin, American Airlines, British Airways, Cathay Pacific Airways, Finnair, Iberia, Japan Airlines, LAN Airlines, Qantas, Royal Jordanian, and S7 Airlines and some 25 affiliated airlines.

Editor's note: Because of an upgrade to LAN's frequent flyer information technology system being implemented shortly after Malaysia Airlines joins oneworld, frequent flyer services and benefits between Malaysia Airlines and LAN will be available from 1 April 2013.

Enrich Platinum cardholders will have Emerald status in the oneworld programme. Enrich Gold will be equivalent to oneworld Sapphire and Enrich Silver will be oneworld Ruby. Enrich Platinum and Gold members will be able to use any of the 550 airport lounges worldwide offered by oneworld member airlines whenever they fly with any of the alliance's carriers. Malaysia Airlines' First and Business Class passengers will also be able to use oneworld partner airline lounges.

Malaysia Airlines will substantially expand the alliance's network in South East Asia, where it will add 14 destinations and one country - Brunei - to the oneworld map.More importantly, the carrier will fill the large hole in the alliance's coverage between the middle east and south-east Asia.

Malaysia Airlines started operations in 1947. Today, it serves more than 60 destinations in almost 30 countries across Asia, Australasia, Middle East, Europe, and North America, including oneworld hubs Hong Kong, London Heathrow, Los Angeles, Sydney and Tokyo Haneda and Narita.
Its present fleet of 88 aircraft - including its flagship Airbus A380s - operates more than 250 departures a day. It boarded 13 million passengers in 2011, generating revenues of MYR 13.6 billion (US$ 4.5 billion).
Read more »